The Library of Alexandria: The Real Truth of Its Loss

Beyond the Blaze: The Multi-Century Tragedy That Erased the Library of Alexandria’s Ancient Wisdom

Imagine losing the equivalent of our entire internet’s foundational knowledge, not in a single, dramatic catastrophe, but through a slow, agonizing intellectual genocide spanning centuries. This isn’t a dystopian novel; it’s the real, complex, and tragically drawn-out story of how humanity lost the Library of Alexandria, its greatest ancient repository of knowledge. Most people envision a single, magnificent edifice consumed in one devastating fire, a Hollywood-esque blaze that instantly wiped away millennia of human thought. But the truth is far more nuanced and, frankly, far more chilling. The “destruction” of the Library of Alexandria wasn’t a singular event; it was a cascade of smaller catastrophes, gradual neglect, political turmoil, and ideological fervor that ultimately stripped humanity of an estimated 700,000 scrolls. This wasn’t a sudden death, but a protracted murder, leaving permanent, unfillable gaps in our understanding of antiquity and profoundly impacting the course of human intellectual development. Prepare to have your understanding of this ancient wonder — and the fragility of knowledge itself — fundamentally reshaped.

The World’s First Universal Brain: What the Library of Alexandria Truly Was

To truly grasp the magnitude of what was lost, we must first understand what the Library of Alexandria truly represented. This was no ordinary collection of scrolls; it was an unprecedented intellectual powerhouse, a beacon of scholarship that aimed to collect all the world’s knowledge.

Founded around 283 BCE by Ptolemy I Soter, one of Alexander the Great’s generals who became the ruler of Egypt, the Library was more than just a building. It was an integral part of a larger research institution known as the Mouseion (Temple of the Muses), a concept that gives us our modern word “museum.” The vision was breathtakingly ambitious: to create a comprehensive, universal library that transcended geographical and cultural boundaries.

Here’s what made it so extraordinary:

• Unrivaled Patronage: The Ptolemaic pharaohs poured immense resources into its establishment and growth. They understood that intellectual capital was as valuable as military might or economic wealth.
• Global Acquisition Strategy: Under Ptolemy III Euergetes, a legendary royal decree mandated that all ships docking in Alexandria surrender their books for copying. The Library’s scribes would meticulously reproduce the texts, returning the copies to the owners and often keeping the originals for the Library’s collection. This aggressive, systematic approach ensured a truly diverse and comprehensive intake of knowledge from across the Mediterranean and beyond.
• A Living Scholarly Community: The Mouseion wasn’t just a repository; it was a vibrant academic commune. Scholars from every corner of the ancient world were invited to reside there, receiving generous stipends, free board, and exemption from taxes. They were encouraged to study, teach, debate, and expand upon the collected wisdom. This constant intellectual cross-pollination fostered an environment of unparalleled innovation and discovery.

In essence, the Library of Alexandria was the world’s first university, research institute, and public library all rolled into one magnificent, state-funded entity. It was an intellectual hub unlike any other before or since, attracting the greatest minds of its age and acting as a catalyst for human progress.

The Priceless Treasures Within: What Humanity Lost

Within the hallowed halls and bustling scriptoria of the Library, truly foundational work was undertaken, and countless masterpieces were preserved. The intellectual output and collected wisdom were simply staggering.

Consider some of the monumental achievements nurtured or housed there:

• Euclid systematized geometry, creating the enduring textbook Elements, which served as the standard for mathematical education for over two millennia.
• Eratosthenes famously calculated the Earth’s circumference with astonishing accuracy using basic geometry and observations of shadows in wells.
• Herophilus pioneered human dissection, making revolutionary discoveries in anatomy and physiology, including distinguishing nerves from tendons and recognizing the brain as the center of intelligence.
• Ptolemy (the astronomer, not the pharaohs) compiled his monumental Almagest, a compendium of Greek astronomical knowledge that dominated Western and Islamic thought for 1400 years.

But beyond these well-known triumphs, the Library housed a mind-boggling array of texts across every conceivable discipline:

• Medical treatises detailing surgical procedures, pharmacology, and theories of disease.
• Astronomical observations from Babylonian, Egyptian, and Greek sources, meticulously compiled over centuries.
• Epic poems, lyrical verse, and philosophical dialogues that shaped classical thought.
• Detailed historical accounts from various cultures, offering perspectives that are now lost forever.
• Mathematical innovations that laid the groundwork for algebra, calculus, and advanced engineering.

Many of the classical Greek texts we do possess today—the works of Homer, Plato, Aristotle, and the tragedians—survived largely because they were diligently preserved, copied, and critically edited at Alexandria.

Imagine, then, the countless other masterpieces that vanished, leaving permanent, unfillable gaps in our understanding of antiquity. We speak of the “lost plays” of Aeschylus, whose approximately 70-90 plays are mostly gone, with only seven surviving. What revolutionary ideas, profound insights, or artistic triumphs did those lost works contain? What other playwrights rivaled Sophocles or Euripides, whose names and works are now mere whispers in academic footnotes, if remembered at all? The Library undoubtedly held unique, uncopied texts—historical narratives, scientific theories, and philosophical arguments—that represented the sole existing copies in the world. Their destruction wasn’t just a loss of paper and ink; it was the obliteration of entire intellectual lineages, pathways of thought, and potential futures.

The First Blow: Caesar’s Accidental Fire (48 BCE)

The myth of a single, catastrophic fire often begins with Julius Caesar. In 48 BCE, during his Alexandrian War, Caesar found himself trapped in the city by Ptolemaic forces. In a desperate tactical move to prevent his ships from falling into enemy hands, he ordered them to be burned in the harbor. The fire, fanned by winds, inadvertently spread to the docks and adjacent warehouses.

This incident is often cited as the definitive moment the Library burned down, but the true story is more nuanced:

• Target: Ancient accounts, including Caesar’s own writings (though self-serving), suggest the fire primarily damaged a storehouse or annex near the docks. This facility likely held a massive collection of scrolls—perhaps 40,000 to 70,000—that were either newly acquired and awaiting cataloging, or duplicates destined for export or secondary collections.
• The Main Library: While a terrible loss of a significant collection, it was likely not the main Library building itself or its entire primary contents, which were situated further inland, away from the harbor. Scholars like Seneca and Plutarch indicate a substantial loss of books, but they don’t explicitly state the entire Library was destroyed.
• Recovery: Crucially, the Library, though wounded, continued to function for centuries afterward. This suggests that while Caesar’s fire was undoubtedly a significant blow—a loss of tens of thousands of invaluable texts—it was far from the total annihilation often depicted. It was the first major wound, a testament to the vulnerability of even the grandest institutions during times of conflict.

A Slow Erosion: Decline Under Roman Rule

Following Caesar’s skirmish, Alexandria became a Roman province in 30 BCE. While the Library still stood and boasted impressive collections, the subsequent Roman era ushered in a period of gradual decline rather than immediate destruction.

Here’s how Roman rule impacted the Library:

• Shift in Patronage: The Ptolemaic pharaohs had invested an almost obsessive level of resources and personal attention in the Library. Roman emperors, while often patrons of knowledge themselves (think of the imperial libraries in Rome), focused their primary attention and resources on institutions in their own capital and other major Roman cities. Alexandria’s unique status as the uncontested intellectual heart of the world slowly began to erode.
• Reduced Funding and Acquisition: This shift meant less funding for new acquisitions, fewer expeditions to procure rare texts, and diminished budgets for the crucial work of scribes and copyists. The relentless growth and unparalleled collection efforts that defined its Ptolemaic golden age began to wane.
• Political Instability: The Roman period in Egypt was frequently marked by political upheavals, insurrections, and conflicts, particularly in Alexandria, a city often at the center of Roman imperial politics. Such instability is inherently detrimental to long-term academic endeavors, disrupting scholarly life and diverting resources towards military and political concerns.
• Intellectual Dispersal: While Alexandria still housed scholars, many prominent intellectuals might have been drawn to Rome or other flourishing centers, further decentralizing the intellectual capital that had once been concentrated solely in Egypt.

The vibrant, dynamic ecosystem of the Mouseion began to stagnate. Its unique appeal as the world’s singular intellectual magnet faded, replaced by a more conventional, albeit still significant, provincial academic institution. The intellectual heart of the world began to beat less vigorously in Alexandria, its unique status slowly eroding.

The Rise of Dogma: Religious Fervor and Intellectual Suppression

By the 3rd and 4th centuries CE, the intellectual and cultural landscape of the Roman Empire was undergoing a seismic transformation. Christianity, once a persecuted minority religion, was rapidly gaining adherents and political power. With its ascendance came a profound shift in focus from pagan classical learning to theological studies.

This was a period of increasing intolerance, where the vast, diverse collection of pagan knowledge housed in the Library became viewed with suspicion, not reverence:

• Edict of Thessalonica (380 CE): Emperor Theodosius I made Nicene Christianity the state religion of the Roman Empire. This decree effectively initiated widespread suppression of pagan cults and temples, transforming them from legitimate religious practices into forbidden heresies.
• Cultural Shift: The classical Greek and Roman texts, steeped in polytheistic mythology, philosophy, and scientific inquiry that often challenged theological doctrines, were seen by zealous Christians as remnants of a condemned past. The pursuit of “truth” shifted from rational inquiry and empirical observation to divine revelation and scriptural interpretation.
• Declining Value of Secular Knowledge: Institutions dedicated to pre-Christian knowledge, like the Library, which celebrated pagan authors and diverse philosophical schools, became targets. Their very existence was seen as a challenge to the new Christian order. This created an atmosphere where the preservation of ancient wisdom was no longer a priority, but a potential source of heresy to be eradicated.

The foundation of the Library’s existence—the celebration of universal, unfettered knowledge—began to crumble under the weight of religious fervor and ideological rigidity.

The Serapeum’s Devastation: A Targeted Act of Destruction (391 CE)

This religious intolerance culminated in another devastating event, often confused with the main Library’s destruction, but equally (if not more) catastrophic for ancient knowledge: the razing of the Serapeum in 391 CE.

The Serapeum was more than just a magnificent temple dedicated to the Greco-Egyptian god Serapis; it also housed a significant daughter library, a substantial collection of thousands of scrolls—possibly up to 40,000. It served as a secondary, yet vital, repository of classical knowledge, and for some scholars, it might have been the primary working library by this point.

Under the direction of Theophilus, the Patriarch of Alexandria, a fanatical Christian mob violently attacked and systematically demolished the Serapeum. This was not an accidental fire or a casualty of war; it was a direct, targeted act of destruction against a prominent symbol of pagan religion and, critically, pagan knowledge. The statues were defaced, the temple torn down, and its precious books either burned, torn apart, or scattered.

This event marked a chilling milestone:

• It was a public, state-sanctioned act of cultural destruction driven purely by religious zealotry.
• It signaled that the era of tolerance for ancient pagan learning was over in Alexandria.
• It resulted in the irreplaceable loss of another vast collection of ancient texts, further diminishing the city’s intellectual heritage.

The destruction of the Serapeum was a clear statement that the new religious order had no room for the old ways of thinking, nor for the knowledge that underpinned them.

The Last Flicker: Hypatia and the Death of Classical Scholarship (415 CE)

Even amidst this turmoil and the destruction of the Serapeum, a flicker of classical learning persisted in Alexandria, personified by the brilliant Neoplatonist philosopher, mathematician, and astronomer Hypatia. She lived and taught in Alexandria in the late 4th and early 5th centuries, representing the city’s last great scholar of the pagan tradition.

Hypatia was an extraordinary figure:

• Intellectual Giant: She made significant contributions to mathematics and astronomy, including commentaries on Apollonius of Perga’s Conics (which studied conic sections like ellipses and parabolas) and Ptolemy’s monumental Almagest. She also developed instruments like the astrolabe and hydrometer.
• Charismatic Teacher: Hypatia attracted numerous students, both pagan and Christian, drawn by her intellect, eloquence, and profound knowledge. She advised prominent public figures, demonstrating that intellectual discourse, however precarious, still held sway in the beleaguered city. Her very existence showed that the flame of classical inquiry had not yet been entirely extinguished.

However, Hypatia’s influence and prominence, her public role as a pagan intellectual in an increasingly Christianized city, made her a dangerous target for those who sought to consolidate religious power and eliminate rival viewpoints.

In 415 CE, she was brutally murdered by a fanatical Christian mob, incited by the Patriarch Cyril of Alexandria, Theophilus’s successor. This was not merely a tragic individual death; it was a chilling symbolic act. Her assassination signaled the definitive triumph of religious extremism over intellectual freedom and scientific inquiry in Alexandria. With her death, the last vestiges of the city’s classical scholarly tradition effectively vanished, paving the way for further intellectual stagnation and the complete extinguishing of the ancient academic flame. It was the intellectual decapitation of Alexandria.

Debunking the Myth: The Caliph Omar and the Muslim Conquest (641 CE)

Another persistent myth attributes the final destruction of the Library to the Muslim Caliph Omar when the Arabs conquered Alexandria in 641 CE. This widespread story claims that Omar ordered the Library’s scrolls to be burned, allegedly stating they either contradicted the Quran and were thus heretical, or agreed with it and were therefore superfluous.

Here’s why this narrative is widely considered a myth by modern historians:

• Late Appearance: The story first appeared centuries later, in the 13th-century writings of Abd al-Latif al-Baghdadi, and gained further traction in the 17th century. Such a significant event would almost certainly have been recorded by earlier, contemporary historians, but it isn’t.
• Historical Context: By 641 CE, the major collections of the Library had already been largely dispersed, destroyed, or had simply decayed over centuries of neglect and repeated assaults. The Serapeum was gone, Hypatia was dead, and the original Mouseion Library was, at best, a shadow of its former glory, likely consisting of a few scattered collections rather than a grand, intact repository.
• Cultural Contradiction: Early Islamic scholarship, particularly in the Abbasid era, was characterized by a profound reverence for ancient knowledge. Islamic scholars actively sought out, translated, and preserved Greek and Roman texts in what became known as the “Translation Movement.” The idea that a Caliph would deliberately destroy such a vast collection of knowledge goes against the broader historical pattern of early Islamic intellectualism.

Therefore, while the story is compelling, it is almost certainly apocryphal. By the time of the Arab conquest, the grand Library of Alexandria, as a unified, thriving institution, had already ceased to exist. Omar’s alleged act would have been largely symbolic, if it happened at all, confirming what was already a tragic reality.

The Cumulative Catastrophe: A Summary of Losses

The Library of Alexandria wasn’t destroyed in a single, cataclysmic blaze, but through a slow, agonizing process. It endured multiple damaging events, each one chipping away at its collections and intellectual vibrancy:

• 48 BCE: Caesar’s Accidental Fire: A significant portion of scrolls, likely in an annex or warehouse, was lost during Julius Caesar’s conflict in Alexandria. This was a severe wound, but not fatal.
• 1st-4th Centuries CE: Roman Neglect and Decline: Under Roman rule, the Library suffered from dwindling royal patronage, reduced funding, and political instability. The vibrant intellectual ecosystem slowly atrophied, and new acquisitions slowed dramatically.
• 391 CE: The Destruction of the Serapeum: A targeted, religiously motivated attack by a Christian mob, under the direction of Patriarch Theophilus, demolished the Serapeum temple and its significant daughter library, resulting in the loss of thousands more scrolls.
• 415 CE: The Murder of Hypatia: The brutal assassination of the last great pagan scholar in Alexandria by a Christian mob, incited by Patriarch Cyril, signaled the definitive end of classical scholarship in the city and extinguished its last intellectual flame.
• Gradual Decay and Dispersion: Throughout these centuries, scrolls not actively maintained would have suffered from environmental decay, insects, and simple neglect. Many were likely dispersed, stolen, or taken by scholars fleeing the increasingly hostile intellectual environment.

What began as the world’s greatest repository of knowledge slowly fragmented and decayed, a testament to how even the grandest institutions can be undone by indifference and ideological fervor over time.

The Unfillable Void: The Profound Impact of Lost Knowledge

The most profound consequence of this gradual destruction is the permanent void it left in our understanding of antiquity. This wasn’t just a loss of ancient texts; it was the erasure of entire perspectives, methodologies, and advancements that would have immeasurably enriched human civilization.

• Literary Darkness: As mentioned, we lost nearly 90% of a major author’s work with Aeschylus. Imagine if Shakespeare’s entire corpus was reduced to just Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet. This applies to countless other playwrights, poets, and authors whose works were unique, uncopied, and vanished forever. What insights into human nature, morality, and aesthetics did these lost works contain?
• Historical Blind Spots: Entire historical narratives from diverse cultures, offering nuanced perspectives on ancient societies beyond the Greco-Roman lens, are now gone. We often piece together ancient history from fragments, tantalizing glimpses that hint at much grander, more detailed accounts that once existed.
• Philosophical Gaps: The Library housed diverse schools of thought, ranging from the Stoics and Epicureans to various Skeptic and Neoplatonic traditions. Many subtle arguments, counter-arguments, and unique interpretations of the human condition and the cosmos were simply erased. These lost dialogues could have provided different frameworks for ethical reasoning, political organization, and metaphysical understanding, potentially enriching the intellectual heritage that shaped later Western and Eastern philosophy. The absence of these varied perspectives arguably led to a narrower, less diverse intellectual tradition for subsequent eras.

This loss didn’t just alter what we know; it altered how we know and what questions we even think to ask about the ancient world.

A Setback for Science and Technology

The loss of the Library of Alexandria profoundly impacted scientific and technological progress, arguably setting back human development by centuries.

• Lost Innovations: The Library contained the cutting-edge scientific and engineering knowledge of its time. Imagine if key advances in mechanics by figures like Ctesibius (who invented water clocks, hydraulis, and early pneumatic devices) or Philo of Byzantium (who designed advanced siege engines and automata) had been preserved more completely. We might have seen early forms of steam engines, sophisticated automata, or more advanced medical practices outlined in texts now gone forever.
• Erosion of Foundational Knowledge: The works of ancient astronomers, mathematicians, and engineers—many of whom worked directly at the Library—were critical foundational texts. Their absence meant that future generations in Europe had to painstakingly rediscover or re-invent knowledge that was already painstakingly compiled and understood centuries earlier. This wasn’t just a delay; it was a forced regression, where the wheel had to be invented anew.
• Disrupted Lineages of Thought: Scientific progress is rarely a series of isolated breakthroughs; it builds upon preceding work. The obliteration of these foundational texts broke crucial lineages of scientific thought, making it harder for subsequent generations to pick up where the ancients left off.

Many historians argue that the Library’s decline contributed significantly to the intellectual stagnation often referred to as the ‘Dark Ages’ in Western Europe. While other factors were certainly at play (political collapse, barbarian invasions), the absence of this central hub of accumulated knowledge, especially its scientific and philosophical texts, meant that when Western Europe eventually began its slow recovery, it had a far smaller, fragmented base of inherited wisdom to draw upon. The bridge between classical antiquity and the Renaissance became much longer and more arduous without the Alexandrian repository.

The True Value: A Living Intellectual Ecosystem

Here’s what most people don’t fully grasp about its value: it wasn’t just how many scrolls it had, but the concentration of knowledge and the active community of scholars it fostered.

Imagine having virtually every significant scientific paper, philosophical treatise, and literary work of an entire civilization gathered in one place, actively being studied, debated, and expanded upon by the greatest minds of the era. The Library served as a living, breathing intellectual ecosystem, a catalyst for innovation and cross-disciplinary thought that was unparalleled and, once lost, irreplaceable for over a thousand years.

Think of it as the ultimate ancient “think tank” or “innovation hub,” where:

• Cross-Pollination Flourished: Mathematicians could consult medical texts; astronomers could delve into philosophical debates; historians could learn from engineers. This interdisciplinary approach is often key to groundbreaking discoveries.
• Knowledge Was Dynamic: It wasn’t just stored; it was actively critiqued, translated, copied, and expanded upon. New commentaries were written, new theories proposed, and new discoveries recorded.
• Global Collaboration: Scholars from diverse cultural backgrounds brought unique perspectives and contributed to a universal pool of knowledge.

The loss of this unique ecosystem was a loss of momentum, a catastrophic disruption of the continuous human quest for understanding.

A Cautionary Tale: Dogmatism, Censorship, and the Fragility of Knowledge

The Library of Alexandria’s fate is a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of dogmatism, censorship, and ideological rigidity. Its destruction was not just a loss of parchment and ink; it was a triumph of fear, religious intolerance, and political opportunism over the pursuit of truth and enlightenment.

The repeated attacks on its collections, often fueled by an unwillingness to tolerate differing viewpoints or ancient “pagan” knowledge, choked off the very intellectual oxygen that human civilization needs to thrive. It’s a tragic lesson on how fragile knowledge preservation truly is when confronted by:

• Political Instability: Wars and civil unrest inevitably lead to the destruction and dispersal of cultural heritage.
• Economic Decline: Lack of funding for maintenance, acquisition, and scholarly support slowly starves institutions of knowledge.
• Ideological Intolerance: When specific belief systems prioritize their own doctrines above the free exchange and preservation of diverse ideas, the destruction of knowledge often follows. This is perhaps the most insidious threat, as it frames the very act of knowing as dangerous.

The story of Alexandria teaches us that knowledge isn’t inherently permanent. It requires constant stewardship, protection, and open-mindedness from the societies that generate it.

Echoes in the Digital Age: Lessons for Our Global Library

Connecting this ancient tragedy to modern life, the story of Alexandria serves as a powerful cautionary tale for us today. In an age of unprecedented information access, where the collective knowledge of humanity seems boundless and instantaneously available, we face new, yet eerily familiar, threats:

• The Spread of Misinformation and Disinformation: Just as ancient rulers feared contradictory scrolls, today, organized campaigns spread false narratives, eroding trust in established facts and critical thinking. This is a form of ‘intellectual pollution’ that can overwhelm truth.
• Digital Censorship and Platform Purges: While sometimes enacted with good intentions (e.g., removing hate speech), the power of centralized platforms to delete content, ban users, or alter algorithms mirrors the vulnerability that led to Alexandria’s demise. Who decides what constitutes “heretical” or “superfluous” knowledge in the digital age?
• The “Right to Be Forgotten” and Erasure of History: Laws designed to protect privacy can inadvertently lead to the deliberate removal of historical records or inconvenient truths from public access, effectively ‘sanitizing’ the past.
• Link Rot and Digital Decay: Even without malicious intent, the sheer volume and ephemeral nature of digital data mean that links break, websites disappear, and formats become obsolete. This ‘digital dark age’ threatens the long-term preservation of our modern intellectual output.
• Centralization of Data: Companies and governments hold vast amounts of information in proprietary databases, making it vulnerable to single points of failure, commercial interests, or political pressure, much like the single collection of scrolls in ancient Alexandria.

Our modern “global library” is vast and distributed, yet paradoxically fragile. It is susceptible to concentrated power, ideological whims, and the very human tendencies towards dogmatism and indifference, much like its ancient predecessor.

What can we do?

• Champion Critical Thinking: Teach ourselves and others to evaluate information, question sources, and embrace nuance.
• Support Independent Archives: Advocate for and contribute to non-profit organizations dedicated to digital preservation and open-access knowledge.
• Promote Diverse Perspectives: Actively seek out and engage with a wide array of viewpoints, rather than succumbing to echo chambers.
• Advocate for Open Data and Decentralization: Push for policies that ensure data longevity, accessibility, and prevent single entities from controlling vast swaths of information.

Rebuilding the Beacon: The New Library of Alexandria

Today, institutions like the New Library of Alexandria (Bibliotheca Alexandrina), inaugurated in 2002, strive to recapture that ancient spirit of universal knowledge. It’s a magnificent structure aiming to house millions of books and digital resources, symbolizing a hopeful return to Alexandria’s intellectual heritage.

However, even with all our technological advancements, the fundamental challenge remains: how do we ensure the preservation of diverse knowledge, protect it from both accidental loss and deliberate destruction, and make it accessible to all, across generations and cultures? The ambition to create a comprehensive repository is back, but the lessons of its ancient predecessor still cast a long, sobering shadow.

Conclusion: The Enduring Legacy of Loss

The destruction of the Library of Alexandria wasn’t a singular, dramatic Hollywood ending; it was a slow, agonizing intellectual genocide spanning centuries. It reminds us that knowledge is not inherently permanent. It requires constant stewardship, protection, and open-mindedness from those who create and inherit it.

The gaps left by its loss are a powerful testament to the value of preserving every voice, every discovery, and every perspective. What we lost there wasn’t just books; it was potential—the potential for humanity to have understood our world, and ourselves, so much sooner and so much more profoundly. The Library of Alexandria’s true legacy is not just its grandeur, but its catastrophic disappearance, serving as an eternal warning against the forces that threaten to extinguish the light of human inquiry. A truly mind-blowing and sobering thought, prompting us to vigilantly protect the vast, yet vulnerable, ocean of knowledge we possess today.

This article is part of our history series. Subscribe to our YouTube channel for video versions of our content.